home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, MARCH 30, 1992
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- No. --- LUIS CUEVAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition
-
- for a writ of certiorari, out-of-time, is denied.
-
- No. --- EDWARD HALAS V. DONALD J. QUIGG
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition
-
- for a writ of certiorari, out-of-time, is denied.
-
- A-642 VIJAI B. PANDEY V. UNITED STATES
-
- The application for release addressed to Justice
-
- White and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- A-689 LESTER M. AYARS, ET UX. V. NEW JERSEY
-
- The application for bail addressed to Justice
-
- White and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- D-1065 IN THE MATTER OF ERIC STEVEN SOLOWITCH
-
- Eric Steven Solowitch, of University Heights, Ohio,
-
- having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of
-
- this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from
-
- the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the
-
- Bar of this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore
-
- issued on January 13, 1992, is hereby discharged.
-
- D-1071 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BUFORD B. WILEY, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Buford B.
-
- Wiley, Jr., of San Diego, California, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Supreme Court of
-
- California and this Court by order of January 21, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Buford B. Wiley, Jr., from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Buford B. Wiley, Jr.,
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1072 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JEFFREY C. TRUDGEON
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Jeffrey
-
- C. Trudgeon, of Upland, California, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Supreme Court of
-
- California and this Court by order of January 21, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Jeffrey C. Trudgeon from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Jeffrey C. Trudgeon be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1073 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL E. ZADAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Michael
-
- E. Zadan, of San Diego, California, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of January 21, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Michael E. Zadan from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Michael E. Zadan be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1077 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HARVEY S. SWICKLE
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Harvey S.
-
- Swickle, of North Miami Beach, Florida, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Florida and this Court by order of January 21, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Harvey S. Swickle from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Harvey S. Swickle be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1080 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LOCKSLEY HUGH BRYAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Locksley
-
- Hugh Bryan, of Lawrence, Massachusetts, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme
-
- Judicial Court of Massachusetts and this Court by order
-
- of January 21, 1992, having suspended the said Locksley
-
- Hugh Bryan from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause
-
- why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Locksley Hugh Bryan be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1099 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HENRY CLAY HART, JR.
-
- It is ordered that Henry Clay Hart, Jr., of
-
- Morgantown, West Virginia, be suspended from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue,
-
- returnable within forty days, requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice
-
- of law in this Court.
-
- D-1100 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL EATON CUNNINGHAM
-
- It is ordered that Michael Eaton Cunningham, of
-
- Brick, New Jersey, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1101 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARK TEMPLE WATSON
-
- It is ordered that Mark Temple Watson, of
-
- Elizabeth, Kentucky, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1102 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF KURT R. CONNER
-
- It is ordered that Kurt R. Conner, of North
-
- Wilkesboro, North Carolina, be suspended from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue,
-
- returnable within forty days, requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice
-
- of law in this Court.
-
- D-1103 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NEWTON ALFRED WINN
-
- It is ordered that Newton Alfred Winn, of St.
-
- Petersburg, Florida, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1104 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GARY L. BLANK
-
- It is ordered that Gary L. Blank, of Chicago,
-
- Illinois, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1105 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PETER G. MEKAS
-
- It is ordered that Peter G. Mekas, of Reed City,
-
- Michigan, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 91-471 CHEM. WASTE MGMT., INC. V. HUNT, GOV. OF ALABAMA
-
- 91-744 ) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA V. CASEY, ROBERT, ET AL.
- )
- 91-902 ) CASEY, ROBERT, ET AL. V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA
-
- The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to
-
- participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for
-
- divided argument are granted.
-
- 91-538 FORSYTH CTY., GEORGIA V. NATIONALIST MOVEMENT
-
- The motion of International Association of Chiefs
-
- of Police, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici
-
- curiae is granted.
-
- 91-719 PARKE, WARDEN V. RALEY, RICKY
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed
-
- further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The motion
-
- for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered
-
- that J. Gregory Clare, Esquire, of Louisville, Kentucky,
-
- is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in
-
- this case.
-
- 91-971 TWO PESOS, INC. V. TACO CABANA, ET AL.
-
- The motion of respondents to expedite consideration
-
- of the motion to dismiss the writ as improvidently
-
- granted is granted. The motion of respondents to dismiss
-
- the writ as improvidently granted is denied.
-
- 91-1010 PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT AUTH. V. METCALF & EDDY, INC.
-
- The motion of respondent for summary disposition is
-
- denied.
-
- 91-1270 RICHARDS, GOV. OF TEXAS V. TERRAZAS, LOUIS, ET AL.
-
- The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in
-
- this case expressing the views of the United States.
-
- 91-1283 GREENBERG, EXECUTOR V. H & H MUSIC CO., ET AL.
-
- The motion of American Public Health Association,
-
- et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is
-
- granted. The motion of Bay Area Lawyers for Individual
-
- Freedom, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici
-
- curiae is granted. The motion of Michigan Protection and
-
- Advocacy for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is
-
- granted. The Solicitor General is invited to file a
-
- brief in this case expressing the views of the United
-
- States.
-
- 91-1494 GUNTER, FRANK O., ET AL. V. ABDULLAH, SHAKUR
- (A-670)
- The application for stay addressed to Justice
-
- Thomas and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- 91-6619 SHANNON, JAMES P., ET UX. V. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE
-
- The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioners are allowed until
-
- April 20, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
- 91-6646 HADLEY, VERL V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion for appointment of counsel is granted
-
- and it is ordered that John Trebon, Esquire, of
-
- Flagstaff, Arizona, is appointed to serve as counsel for
-
- the petitioner in this case.
-
- 91-7252 NEWMAN, PEARL, ET AL. V. ORENTREICH, NORMAN
-
- The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioners are allowed until
-
- April 20, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
-
-
- APPEAL -- JURISDICTION NOTED
-
- 91-1420 GROWE, SEC. OF STATE, MINNESOTA V. EMISON, JAMES, ET AL.
-
- In this case probable jurisdiction is noted.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
- 91-1043 PROF. REAL ESTATE, ET AL. V. COLUMBIA PICT. INDUS. ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- 91-10 SPECTRUM SPORTS, INC., ET AL. V. McQUILLAN, SHIRLEY
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted
-
- limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
-
- 91-7094 RICHMOND, WILLIE L. V. LEWIS, DIR., ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 91-758 RASA, PONCIANO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-961 INTL. CHEM. CO., ET AL. V. NLRB
-
- 91-1058 McBRIDE, HAYDEE V. INS
-
- 91-1097 WARD, ALDEN V. SEC. OF TRANSPORTATION
-
- 91-1104 KEGLEY, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1123 RIVES, CHARLES, ET AL. V. ICC, ET AL.
-
- 91-1124 HAVASUPAI TRIBE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 91-1155 SMITH, JO A., ETC., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1266 WILSON, ROBERT, ET AL. V. KARR, TUTTLE, KOCH, ET AL.
-
- 91-1268 CITY OF NEWPORT, ET AL. V. LEE, ARMINA
-
- 91-1275 WILKERSON, OSCAR V. LAKE CTY. SUPER. CT., ET AL.
-
- 91-1276 GORDON, IRVIN, ET UX. V. BD. OF ZONING, CARROLL CTY.
-
- 91-1278 FELDMAN, MARK V. GLUCROFT, STEPHEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-1290 SCHWARZER, HENRY V. DOUGLAS CTY., NEVADA
-
- 91-1291 CARLISLE, ELIZABETH, ET AL. V. BRADSHAW, BERNARD, ET AL.
-
- 91-1293 LENDABARKER, WILLIAM V. ILLINOIS
-
- 91-1309 CORTEC INDUS., INC., ET AL. V. WESTINGHOUSE CREDIT CORP.
-
- 91-1311 RAPPS, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. JACKSON, GLENDA, ET AL.
-
- 91-1315 MIRMAN, PAUL S. V. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, ETC.
-
- 91-1317 ADAM CAB, INC. V. COLLINS, MARCUS
-
- 91-1319 LANGFORD, FRED V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1323 BURNEY, CALVIN, ET AL. V. OHIO
-
- 91-1329 MOODY, SHEARN V. SMITH, W. STEVE, ET AL.
-
- 91-1350 SPAETH, ROMAN, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1358 SCHWARTZ, JOSEPH V. CITY OF FLINT
-
- 91-1372 WOODS, JARRETT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1373 CALERO, RAMON, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1386 LOWRY, JONATHAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1389 VIGIL, HERBERT V. SOLANO, HENRY, ET AL.
-
- 91-6300 KALTENBACH, ROBERT V. WHITLEY, WARDEN
-
- 91-6663 WALLACE, PHILLIP V. ROBINSON, MERLE, ET AL.
-
- 91-6682 JEFFRESS, JESSE W. V. JEFFRESS, GLENDA J.
-
- 91-6781 KATTULA, RICHARD P. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6837 REED, ZELDONIA Q. V. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN.
-
- 91-6858 CHERIF, DANNY O. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6859 RESTREPO, DARIO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6899 JAUREGUI, PEDRO L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6905 OCHOA-FABIAN, JESUS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6938 ALZAMORA, RUBEN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6939 JERMOSEN, DONALD V. SMITH, HAROLD, ET AL.
-
- 91-6966 RAIBON, LAWRENCE E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7121 SINGER, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7142 BLANKENSHIP, ROY V. ZANT, WARDEN
-
- 91-7168 GILES, OLIVER V. GEORGIA
-
- 91-7173 BACCAM, PHET V. IOWA
-
- 91-7175 ROSS, JEROME V. DAKOTA RAIL, INC., ET AL.
-
- 91-7182 KEYES, ELLIS V. HUCKLEBERRY HOUSE, ET AL.
-
- 91-7184 GREEN, SAM V. SOUTH CAROLINA
-
- 91-7189 AKIONA, AARON K., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 91-7190 SEWELL, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7191 WILLIAMS, MITCHELL V. BANKS, RALPH
-
- 91-7193 VORHAUER, HANS V. CONRAD, JOSEPH, ET AL.
-
- 91-7198 BOCLAIR, STANLEY V. ILLINOIS
-
- 91-7201 CARTWRIGHT, BRYAN V. WHITE, SUPT.
-
- 91-7206 JOHNSON, GARY N. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-7211 CORDLE, ARZELLA A. V. SQUARE D CO.
-
- 91-7214 GRIMES, JASON M. V. WELLS, WARDEN
-
- 91-7215 FANT, ARNOLD N. V. TURNER, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7216 KALTENBACH, ROBERT V. STALDER, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7218 MERCHANT, JACK W. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 91-7219 PAIGE, TYRONE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7223 MASUTH, DANIEL E. V. INDIANA
-
- 91-7224 PATTILLO, JOHNNY V. LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
-
- 91-7228 MORGAN, NATHANIEL V. SOUTH CAROLINA
-
- 91-7232 HOFMANN, ELSA O. V. PRESSMAN TOY CORP., ET AL.
-
- 91-7234 LEE, MICHAEL O. V. WALGREEN'S COMPANY, ET AL.
-
- 91-7236 MOORE, JAMES C. V. JAMES, JUDGE
-
- 91-7245 RENEER, JOHN E. V. SAMBERG, MIKE, ET AL.
-
- 91-7246 CONNOR, MICHAEL V. MOBIL CHEM. CO.
-
- 91-7271 STOKES, DENNIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7275 SMITH, OTIS V. OHIO
-
- 91-7276 GREEN, MICHAEL V. PENNSYLVANIA
-
- 91-7278 VALLADARES, ROY V. TEXAS
-
- 91-7279 AGATI, ANTONIO, ETC. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7283 YOUNG, LARRY, J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7286 LAWRENCE, GILBERT V. HOKE, SUPT.
-
- 91-7293 BAILES, ROBERT E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7299 SCHMITT, KENNETH V. FLORIDA
-
- 91-7312 JORDAN, ABRAM J. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 91-7317 QUINSKY, TOM V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7343 MARSHALL, JOHN D. V. SALTON, EDITH E.
-
- 91-7365 COWAN, CLARENCE M. V. GALLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7387 CARRION-CALIZ, RAMIRO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7391 STOUFFER, BIGLER J. V. OKLAHOMA
-
- 91-7394 IRWIN, WILLIAM T. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7402 BARRIOS-BARCELONA, MOISES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7405 DELGADO, MRS. G.A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7407 MASSEY, LARRY B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7429 HINTZE, BARRY J. V. SOUTHWEST GAS INCORPORATED
-
- 91-7433 WILLIAMS, LEONARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7436 CORN, LESLIE K. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7440 CARR, MELVIN W. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7454 REYNOLDS, WILLIE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7464 THOMAS, MICHAEL G. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7465 CRANFILL, EDMOND M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7466 SCHIMMEL, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7467 CHASE, DARIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7473 DIXON, NOLAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7479 TAYLOR, JOHN A. V. UTAH
-
- 91-7486 GOMEZ, DAVE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7489 ZUCKERMAN, RICHARD P. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7492 LANGE, JEROME F. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7499 TOVAR-PAZ, JORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7501 BLADE, RONNIE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7513 CAHILL, ROBERT V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- 91-1032 SHEARSON LEHMAN MORT. CORP. V. LAGUNA, EMILIO, ET AL.
-
- 91-1198 CHESAPEAKE W. RWY., ET AL. V. TAX COMMR., VIRGINIA, ET AL.
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- Justice White and Justice O'Connor would grant
-
- certiorari.
-
- 91-1255 DeROBERTIS, WARDEN, ET AL. V. HENDERSON, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- The motion of respondents for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
- 91-1282 CONNECTICUT BANK & TRUST V. WILMINGTON TRUST CO., ET AL.
-
- The motion of Maritime Law Association of the
-
- United States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
-
- is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- denied.
-
- 91-1288 KINDIG, MARION, ET AL. V. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of this petition.
-
- 91-1341 HOAI, THANH VONG, ET AL. V. VO, THANH VAN, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Vietnamese Community of Washington,
-
- D. C., Maryland and Virginia for leave to file a brief
-
- as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied. Justice Thomas took no part in the
-
- consideration or decision of this motion and this
-
- petition.
-
-
-
- HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
-
- 91-7511 IN RE RICHARD ZZIE
-
- 91-7542 IN RE OSCAR GATES
-
- The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are
-
- denied.
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
- 91-6026 WION, BARRY M. V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
-
- 91-6318 CHOICE, THOMAS V. BEYER, HOWARD L., ET AL.
-
- 91-6388 MOORE, HOWARD V. O'MALLEY, MICHAEL, ET AL.
-
- 91-6425 PAVLICO, JOSEPH J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
- 91-5429 PIRON, PETER C. V. DE GROOTE, PAUL M., ET AL.
-
- The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice
-
- Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of
-
- this petition.
-
- 91-6802 ANDREWS, WILLIAM V. DELAND, DIR., UTAH DOC, ET AL.
- (A-644)
- The application to suspend the effect of the order
-
- denying the petition for a writ of certiorari addressed
-
- to Justice Blackmun and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- The petition for rehearing is denied.
-
-
-
- RECESS ORDER
-
- The Court will take a recess from Monday, April 6,
-
- 1992 until Monday, April 20, 1992.
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-